Страница: 3/3
Addendum 1
Siberia is Among Leaders in Raw Materials Markets[5]
Siberia's rating looks more impressive in some groups of goods than its 7-th general placing. Split the whole flow of commercial projects into 9 groups of goods, and for 6 of them Siberia joins the leading three:
Timber and Paper
I Siberia 32.6
II Moscow 19.1
III St.-Petersburg 14.2
Fuel
I Siberia 20.3
II Urals 13.2
III Moscow 12.3
Chemical Products
I Moscow 17.2
II Siberia 15.7
III St.-Petersburg 11.9
Construction Materials
I Moscow 22.0
II Siberia 14.1
III Urals 5.6
Transportation
I Moscow 23.6
II Siberia 12.4
III Volga 12.1
Metals
I St.-Petersburg 20.9
II Urals 19.6
III Siberia 11.7
Bibliography
«The New Polgrave a dictionary of economic» Editor: J.Eatwell, M.Mmilgate P.Newman
Chair of Raw Material Economy and World Resource Balances Prof. Dr.rer.nat. E. Machens (temporary appointment)
«Positive Theory of International Trade» Editor: R.W. Jones, J.P. Neary (pages 31-37)
«The World Economy History & Prospect» Editor: W.W Rostow (part 52 «The Future of the World Economy» , pages 610-618)
«Siberia is Among Leaders in Raw Materials Markets»Editors: Alexei Alexeev, Andrey Kiselev
[1] In Jones (1980) a two-country Recardian model is illustrated in which one commodity requires an intermediate input and technologies differ between countries The pattern of trade can be reversed as a result of variations in the price of the traded intermediate.
[2] Both papers cite the use of the continuum concept in Dornbusch, Fischer, and Samuelson (1977).
[3] À limitation of both papers is the assumption that costs (or factor proportions) move monotonically from lower to higher stages of production. If not, trade may take place à1 many points in the productive spectrum in the absence of inhibiting transport costs.
[4] This model is described in simplified terms by Findlay (1979).
Реферат опубликован: 8/12/2006